Archive for July, 2012

Troponin Bump

A 47 year-old man was previously being managed for hypertension but stopped taking his medications in favor of a “homeopathic” regimen. There was periodic exertional dyspnea but no chest pain, lightheadedness, orthopenea, or peripheral edema. While driving one day he became acutely short of breath. Paramedics found him severely dyspnic with tachycardia, basilar rails, and a blood pressure of 250/155mmHg. He denied chest pain, heaviness, neck, back, or arm discomfort. An EKG was acquired. ST elevation was noted in contiguous precordial leads accompanied by a late anterior transition zone. There was also ST depression in the inferior and lateral leads. The appearance of LVH was severe but  the S/ST proportions were difficult to assess due to the paper size. On arrival at the hospital another two EKGs were captured. This appeared slightly more benign, however a positive troponin assay was returned at 2.24ng/mL.

Physical exam at this time was notable for positive hepatojugular reflux, a pronounced S4 gallop, and crackles throughout the lung fields. There was no JVD or peripheral edema. The BUN was 40, Creatinine 2.2, ALT and AST of 51 and 57. The LDL was >200. No BNP was recorded. Detailed history revealed one prior episode of hypertensive crisis but no established CAD or CHF. He had quit smoking but continued to drink somewhat heavily as per his wife. His father suffered from both HTN and CHF and was no longer living.

The patient was admitted to ICU with hypertensive crisis and heart failure. Ejection fraction by echo was estimated at 30% with LVH and global systolic dysfunction. Cardiac catheterization on the third hospital day revealed a right dominant coronary system with severe triple vessel disease constituted by multiple complex lesions and several well-formed collaterals. Recommendation was for CABG evaluation.

The troponin peaked slightly above 4.0.


Elevation of cardiac troponins in the absence of acute coronary occlusion is not uncommon. This is particularly true of the severely ill. In the absence of a diagnostic electrocardiogram, low and even moderate level elevations should not overly persuade the clinician of an acute thrombotic coronary etiology.

On the molecular scale, muscle contraction results from a ratchet like interaction between actin and myosin microfilaments. The myosin “thick” filaments repeatedly attach, pull, and release from the actin “thin” filaments. As the two filaments slide along one another this telescoping is transmitted to the boundaries of the cell to produce a unified cellular contraction.

Retrieved from:

In order to regulate and coordinate the contraction of filaments, an inhibitory protein, tropomyosin, lies along the length of each actin strand and occludes the actin-myosin attachment sites. When membrane depolarization occurs, calcium ions are released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and bind to tropomyosin, shifting it out of the way and disinhibiting the contractile interaction of myosin and actin.

Retrieved from:

Tropomyosin effects its inhibitory activity at the active site through the troponin regulatory complex. This complex is a trimer consisting of troponin I (cTnI), troponin C (cTnC), and troponin T (cTnT). The cross-bridge active sites are occluded by the inhibitory “I” tropoin subunit. When the myocyte depolarizes, calcium ions are released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and bind to the troponin C subunit. This produces a conformational change in the complex which retracts troponin I and unblocks the binding site for cross-bridge between actin and myosin.

Retrieved from:

Serum immunoassays for the proteins troponin I and troponin T have shown high sensitivity for cardiac myocyte injury and necrosis. The aggregate of these proteins is structurally bound to tropomyosin, however some free cytosolic troponin I and T is known to exist. The mechanisms where by these proteins are liberated into the blood serum remain incompletely characterized.

Retrieved from:

Significant elevations of serum troponins regularly occur in the absence of acute thrombotic coronary occlusion. Thygesen and collegues have described three categories of non-ACS related troponin elevation:

Modified from Thygesen et al. (4)

Mechanisms potentially responsible for troponin elevation in this case include:

  1. Heart Failure
  2. Malignant Hypertension
  3. Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
  4. Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy
  5. Renal Failure
  6. Tachycardia with demand ischemia due to stable coronary leisions
  7. Unlikely but possible PE or significant Pulmonary Hypertension

The literature addressing non-ACS related troponin elevation is extensive; below are excerpts touching on some of the most common etiologies.

Regarding troponin elevation in heart failure:

“Release of TnI from cytosolic pool as a result of myocardial cell membrane injury without damage of structurally bound TnI has been reported. However, cytosolic TnI has been estimated to account for < 2% of total intracellular TnI. It is perhaps more likely that detectable troponin in HF reflects ongoing degradation of contractile protein and cellular injury. An increased level of neurohormonal factors, oxidative stress, and a number of cytokines are universal in HF. Each of these factors is known to promote cardiac cell death; therefore, they may be responsible for the elevation of troponin in HF.” (3)

Regarding pericarditis:

“…Elevation of troponin in acute pericarditis is believed to represent injury of the epicardial layer of myocardium adjacent to visceral pericardium where the active inflammation occurs…” (3)

“Bonnefoy et al reported that approximately one half of their 69 consecutive patients (49%) with acute idiopathic pericarditis had troponin I (TnI) levels > 0.5 ng/mL. Twenty-two percent had TnI levels > 1.5 ng/mL, their cut-off level for acute MI. The average TnI level was 8 ± 12 ng/mL (range, 0 to 48 ng/mL). The median level was, however, only 1 ng/mL.” (3)

Regarding troponin elevation in sepsis:

“…there are several potential mechanisms, other than acute MI, for troponin release in septic patients. First, it is well known that a number of local and circulating mediators (eg, cytokines or reactive oxygen species) possess direct cardiac myocytoxic properties. Secondly, myocardial injury from the effect of bacterial endotoxins has been demonstrated. Finally, dysfunction of the microcirculation has been described in sepsis. This microvascular dysfunction can lead to ischemia and reperfusion injury of the myocardial cell.” (3)

Regarding troponin elevation in PE:

“Right ventricular dilation and strain from sudden increase in pulmonary arterial resistance is believed to be the cause of troponin release in acute PE.” (3)

“Giannitis et al, reported the incidence and prognostic significance of troponin T (TnT) elevation in patients with confirmed acute PE. Of the 56 patients, 32% had elevated TnT levels (≥ 0.1 ng/mL). In contrast, only 7% had CK levels above twice the upper limit of normal. Using a clinical grading system adapted from Goldhaber, 23%, 46%, and 30% of the patients were classified as having small PE, moderate-to-large PE, and massive PE, respectively. Elevated TnT was only observed in patients with either moderate-to-large PE or massive PE. None of those with small PE had increased TnT. TnT-positive patients were more likely to have right ventricular dysfunction, severe hypoxemia, prolonged hypotension, or cardiogenic shock. They also more often required inotropic therapy or mechanical ventilation than those with negative TnT. Complete or incomplete right bundle-branch block or ST-T changes on ECG were also more prevalent in TnT-positive subgroup. More importantly, TnT positivity was associated with approximately 30-fold increased risk of in-hospital mortality. In addition, TnT level was found to be an independent predictor of the 30-day outcome. Survival rates at 30 days were 60% and 95%, respectively, for those with and without TnT elevation.” (3)

Regarding troponin elevation in renal disease:

“In patients with severe renal dysfunction troponin T as well as troponin I, elevations are found that cannot be linked to myocardial injury. The reasons for these elevations are not yet convincingly explained. Reexpression of cardiac isoforms in skeletal muscles has been excluded by different analyses and investigators.13,14 Loss of membrane integrity and constant outflow from the free cytosolic troponin pool as well as amplified elevation of normal low levels because of impaired renal excretion are more likely. The higher unbound cytosolic pool and higher molecular weight may explain why troponin T is more frequently found elevated than troponin I.” (2)

As a final note, in 2011 Afonso et al retrospectively reviewed 567 patients admitted with a diagnosis of “hypertensive emergency.” Of these, 186 (32%) had cTnI elevation with the mean peak level at 4.06. They conclude, “Predictors of cTnI were age, history of hypercholesterolemia, blood urea nitrogen level, pulmonary edema, and requirement for mechanical ventilation. … Neither the presence nor the extent of cTnI elevation was associated with mortality, while age, history of coronary artery disease, and blood urea nitrogen level were predictive of mortality.” (1)


  1. Afonso L, et al. Prevalence, determinants, and clinical significance of cardiac troponin-I elevation in individuals admitted for a hypertensive emergency. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Aug;13(8):551-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00476.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
  2. Hamm, CW, Giannitsis, E, Katus, HA Cardiac troponin elevations in patients without acute coronary syndrome. Circulation 2002; 106, 2871-2872
  3. Roongsritong C, Warraich I, Bradley C. Common Causes Of Troponin Elevations In The Absence Of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence And Clinical Significance. CHEST. 2004;125(5):1877-1884.
  4. Thygesen K, Mair J, Katus H, et al. Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2197
  5. Gibson, M. et al. Elevated cardiac troponin concentration in the absence of an acute coronary syndrome. UpToDate. July 11, 2012.

STEMI seen in PVC

Although the previous case study was written for formalistic reasons and is admittedly neither very interesting nor particularly original, there is one interesting feature here worthy of note:

The arrows indicate complexes resulting from intermittant LBBB or PVCs with LBBB morphology. The latter is more likely given that their differing frontal plane axes (-60 vs +60) implicate two separate foci.

Despite aberrant conduction, the current of injury resulting from the anterior infarct remains explicit and is diagnostic of coronary occlusion.

In the first EKG (04:15) the complexes in V2 and V3 show appropriately discordant STE, but the ST/S ratio is groselly excessive. In 2010, Dodd and colegues demonstrated that an ST/S ratio >0.2 carries high specificity for LAD occlusion (1). Note the ratios in this case:

V2:    ST/S = 6mm/7mm = ~0.86

V3:    ST/S = 5.5mm/11mm = 0.5

In the second EKG (07:10) there is >1mm concordant STE in V4 and V6. In LBBB, the ST segments should always be discordant, and, when the terminal R wave is positive, they should show an appropriate proportion of ST depression. Thus, even in V6 where the J-point is isoelectric, there is a conspicuous absence of ST depression. This is a STEMI equivalent (2). Even if this patient had a baseline LBBB and the entire EKG showed wide-complex aberrancy, the MI would not be hidden.

These features as illustrated here closely reflect the more thorough and authoratative work of Dr. Smith in his May 21, 2011 blog post, “LBBB: Is There STEMI?

Reproduced from his text:

Smith modified Sgarbossa rule:

  1. At least one lead with concordant STE (Sgarbossa criterion 1) or
  2. At least one lead of V1-V3 with concordant ST depression (Sgarbossa criterion 2) or
  3. Proportionally excessively discordant ST elevation in V1-V4, as defined by an ST/S ratio of equal to or more than 0.20 and at least 2 mm of STE. (this replaces Sgarbossa criterion 3 which uses an absolute of 5mm)


  1. Dodd KW. Aramburo L. Broberg E. Smith SW. For Diagnosis of Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction Due to Left Anterior Descending Artery Occlusion in Left Bundle Branch Block, High ST/S Ratio Is More Accurate than Convex ST Segment Morphology (Abstract 583).  Academic Emergency Medicine 17(s1):S196; May 2010.
  2. Dodd KW. Aramburo L. Henry TD. Smith SW. Ratio of Discordant ST Segment Elevation or Depression to QRS Complex Amplitude is an Accurate Diagnostic Criterion of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Presence of Left Bundle Branch Block (Abstract 551).  Circulation October 2008;118 (18 Supplement):S578.
  3. Dr. Stephan Smith. “LBBB: Is There STEMI?” Dr. Smith’s ECG Blog.

Artifact from Frayed Leads Obscures STEMI


Artifactual activity on 12-lead EKG presents a significant impediment to electrocardiographic diagnosis. A case is presented here in which underlying STEMI could not be appreciated due to artifactual interference from frayed electrode leads. Clinicians should to be aware of the causes and presentations of EKG artifact in order to avoid similar pitfalls.


An “all fields” PubMed search was conducted using the term “artifact” in conjunction with each of the terms “STEMI”, “myocardial infarction”, “EKG”, “ECG”, and “ST segment.”  Results yielded 0, 76, 19, 317, and 22 references respectively. These 434 citations were then screened for relevance according to title. The scope of the search spanned from 1973 to June 2012.


Numerous sources and types of artifactual interference on EKG have been identified. Artifact may be defined as any electrical activity present on EKG recording which does not directly and appropriately reflect cardiac activity. Artifactual interference may be classified as either of primary, non-cardiac etiology, or of secondary etiology when authentic cardiac signals are deranged due to incompetent acquisition, processing, or presentation. In the former category, a multitude of electrical and mechanical devices have been implicated (1-12, 46). Movement artifacts such as patient tremor, respiration, coughing, and hiccups have also been described (13-21, 43, 44). Artifact resulting from bed or stretcher movement should also be included in this subgroup.

Regarding the derangement of authentic cardiac signals rather than non-cardiac interference, investigators have noted an extensive variety of effects due to electrode misplacement (25-28, 32, 37). Acquisition filters have also been found to deceptively alter the appearance of the electrocardiogram (30, 33). Inconsistent electrode contacts as well as flawed or inverted lead connections can be problematic (45). Printers, monitors, and electronic transmission software have all been implicated in significant distortion or augmentation of the EKG (29, 41).

Too numerous to count case reports involving both primary non-cardiac interference as well as secondary artifact effects have illustrated a diversity of arrhythmic, ischemic, and other electrocardiographic mimics. Typically low frequency primary artifact resulting from tremors or rhythmic movement of physiologic cycle length has been associated with the mimicry of dysrhymias, often wide complex dysrhthmias (13-21, 23). Derangements of authentic cardiac activity resulting from lead reversals, filtering effects, and post-acquisition processing have frequently been associated with the mimicry of ischemic EKG patterns. The appearance of pathologic Q-waves, dramatic changes in cardiac axis, T-wave deflection, and alterations of R-wave amplitude and progression have been documented (25-27). False ST elevation and depression have also been described (30, 31). Both the masking of intrinsic pathology and the pathologic representation of healthy cardiac signals have been noted (30-34, 40, 45). The consequences of unrecognized artifactual interference can include inappropriate pharmacological and electrical therapies; significant morbidity and mortality has resulted (15, 18, 19, 28).

In some cases, the clinician can exploit artifactual activity. Shivering artifact in the presence of electrocardiographic evidence of hypothermia is such a case (42). The utility of respiratory artifact has also been explored (24). More recently, the exploitation of systematic computer algorithm interpretation error has been discussed relative to “double counting” of heart rate in the setting of hyperkalemia (41).

In this case report, an anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction was masked by opaque artifactual activity resulting from frayed electrode leads. To date, this would appear to be the first documented case of such an occurrence.

Case Presentation:

An 85 year-old Caucasian man with a history of atrial fibrillation and anxiety awoke at 2:30 AM with chest pressure and shortness of breath. He alerted his daughter and she administered his Xanex, believing his symptoms to be psychosomatic. When this had little effect, an ambulance was called. On their arrival at 3:40 AM, paramedics administered oxygen and 162mg of aspirin. Vital signs at this time were within normal limits. A rhythm strip was acquired which demonstrated heavy artifact obscuring all but one lead. Additional leads were not visualized and no intelligible 12-lead could be obtained.

The patient was transported to a non-PCI capable community hospital. There, a 12-lead EKG was recorded which showed explicit anterior wall STEMI.

The troponin was 0.65. Tenectaplase was administered at 4:30AM; a repeat EKG 90 minutes later was unchanged. At this time, he was transferred to an outside hospital for cardiac catheterization.

On arrival at 7:05AM, the patient was hypotensive with a systolic blood pressure of 70mmHg.

An aortic balloon pump was placed and dopamine initiated. A complete occlusion of the mid-LAD was identified; thrombectomy was performed and the vessel stented with TIMI3 result. Hypotension persisted and the patient developed increasing lethargy and dyspnea. He vomited and became apenic while in cath lab. At 8:15AM he was intubated and placed on levophed; his ejection fraction was less than <15%. Hypotension remained refractory despite the addition of vasopressin and dobutamine. At 10:25AM, the troponin was 92. At this time he was unresponsive on exam with central cyanosis and mottling to all four extremities. There was pulmonary edema with an arterial line indicating a systolic BP of 50mmHg. Blood gas analysis indicated a pH of 7.10. He was described as not likely to survive and made DNR at 10:50AM. At 11:58 AM no carotid pulse could be appreciated and he was pronounced dead.


Retrospective analysis of the prehospital EKG artifact was undertaken. The system was traced from the electrode-lead junctions back to the monitor. In this case, a Physio-Control Life Pack 12 device was being utilized and revealed cable-junction fraying. Experienced operators of this device are often familiar with this type of artifact, and the cable-junction is a known weak point.

Cable fraying or, more broadly, lead-connection artifact, has a distinct electrocardiographic signature. Fequentlely there is an erraticly wandering baseline with sharp, irregular voltage spikes showing inconsistantly varrying amplitudes. As usualy only one connection is effected, the artifact should localize to a particular lead. Thus there should also be leads present which are free of artifact.

Note that in the initial EKG from this case there are voltage spikes of varying amplitudes, a chaotically wandering baseline, and a lead-specific artifact distribution. Other etiologies may mimic lead-connection artifact, but are readily distinguishable once they become familiar to the clinician.

60Hz AC interference should demonstrate almost exactly 60 deflections per second; the baseline typically will not wander and the amplitude will be constant or demonstrate orderly undulation. (Image retrieved from “,”

Artifact from nerve or muscle stimulators should also be of fixed amplitude and hold to a stable baseline. (1)

Shivering artifact may or may not be accompanied by hypothermic ECG stigmata such as bradycardia or Osborne waves; note that the artifact is not confined to any single lead distribution. (Image retrieved from “,”

Artifact from resting tremor is typically of lower (physiologic) frequency and thus can mimic VT or a-flutter; relative to lead-connection artifact, tremor interference is pervasive, consistent, and of much longer cycle length.

The distinguishing hallmarks of lead-connection artifact are,

  1. It is confined to a specific lead distribution– the lead with inconsistent connectivity.
  2. There is a chaotically wandering baseline.
  3. The cycle lengths are short (30-70Hz ?) and grossly irregular.
  4. The amplitude is widely variable and randomly distributed.

When lead-connection artifact is recognized, operators can trouble-shoot the system  for correctable problems. Often a “positional” solution can be temporarily utilized to acquire an acceptable tracing before the cables can be replaced. As in this case, when the origin of the artifact is unknown to the practitioner, it is not possible to investigate such a solution. The tragic coincidence presented here, where in the detection of STEMI was obscured by lead-connection artifact, illustrates that the potential significance of this issue.

While newer lead hardware has been made available, many operators continue to utilize the monitoring cables described in this case.


In this case, an anterior wall STEMI could not be appreciated due to artifactual interference. The patient was therefore transported to a non-PCI capable facility; subsequently, he did not receive definitive reperfusion until nearly five hours after his initial encounter with ACLS providers. The result was a catastrophic infarction from which he could not recover.

Operators should be familiar with the appearance of lead-connection artifact and maintain a high index of suspicion when checking and trouble-shooting this hardware.


  1. Equipment-related electrocardiographic artifacts: causes, characteristics, consequences, and correction. Patel SI, Souter MJ. Anesthesiology. 2008 Jan;108(1):138-48.
  2. Electrocardiographic artifacts during electroconvulsive therapy. Patel SI. J Electrocardiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;42(4):307-9. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
  3. Differential electrocardiographic artifact from implanted thalamic stimulator. Khan IA. Int J Cardiol. 2004 Aug;96(2):285-6. PMID: 15262047
  4. Electrocardiographic artifact caused by extracorporeal roller pump. Kleinman B, Shah K, Belusko R, Blakeman B. J Clin Monit. 1990 Jul;6(3):258-9. PMID: 2380757
  5. Electrocardiogram artifacts caused by deep brain stimulation. Constantoyannis C, Heilbron B, Honey CR. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004 Aug;31(3):343-6.
  6. ECG artifact produced by crystalloid administration through blood/fluid warming sets. Paulsen AW, Pritchard DG. Anesthesiology. 1988 Nov;69(5):803-4. PMID: 3189938 Free full text
  7. Life-threatening ECG artifact during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Schiller EC, Heerdt P, Roberts J. Anesthesiology. 1988 Mar;68(3):477-8. PMID: 3345012 Free full text
  8. ECG artifact due to deep brain stimulation. Martin WA, Camenzind E, Burkhard PR. Lancet. 2003 Apr 26;361(9367):1431. PMID: 12727397
  9. Electrocardiographic artifact induced by an electrical stimulator implanted for management of neurogenic bladder. Madias JE. J Electrocardiol. 2008 Sep-Oct;41(5):401-3. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
  10. An unusual electrocardiogram artifact: what is its source? [Gastric PM]  J Reddy NK, Merla R, Pehlivanov ND, Pasricha PJ, Ware DL, Birnbaum Y. Electrocardiol. 2005 Oct;38(4):337-9. PMID: 16216608
  11. Unusual ECG artifact. [Infusion Pump] Graham MM. J Nucl Med. 1981 Jul;22(7):660. PMID: 7252570 Free full text
  12. Electromechanical association: a subtle electrocardiogram artifact.[Radial arterial impulse] Aslanger E, Yalin K. J Electrocardiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;45(1):15-7. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
  13. Tremor-induced ECG artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Srikureja W, Darbar D, Reeder GS. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1337-8.
  14. Tremor-related artefact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Ortega-Carnicer J. Resuscitation. 2005 Jun;65(3):243-4. PMID: 15919558
  15. Parkinson’s tremor mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Bhatia L, Turner DR. Age Ageing. 2005 Jul;34(4):410-1. PMID: 15955765 [Free full text]
  16. Pseudo-ventricular tachycardia: electrocardiographic artefact mimicking non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a patient evaluated for syncope. A Vereckei. Heart. 2004 January; 90(1): 81. PMCID: PMC1768000. [Free Full Text]
  17. Ventricular pseudo-bigeminy due to sustained myoclonus. Chung DK, Reed JR, Chung EK. Heart Lung. 1976 Nov-Dec;5(6):961-3. PMID: 1049219
  18. An unusual case of misdiagnosed ventricular tachycardia. Boos CJ, Khan MY, Thorne SEmerg Med J. 2008 Mar;25(3):173-4.
  19. Pseudo ventricular tachycardia: a case report. Riaz A, Gardezi SK, O’Reilly M. Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Jun;179(2):295-6. Epub 2009 Aug 7. PMID: 19662493
  20. Tremor-induced ECG artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Srikureja W, Darbar D, Reeder GS. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1337-8. PMID: 10982552 Free full text
  21. Tremor-induced ECG artifact mimicking ventricular tachycardia. Freedman B. Circulation. 2001 May 29;103(21):E112-2. PMID: 11382744 Free full text
  22. ECG artifact simulating supraventricular tachycardia during automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Lampert BA, Sundstrom FD. Anesth Analg. 1988 Nov;67(11):1096-8. PMID: 3189899
  23. Pseudo-atrial flutter/fibrillation in Parkinson’s disease. Prabhavathi B, Ravindranath KS, Moorthy N, Manjunath CN. Indian Heart J. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):296-7.
  24. The diagnostic use of respiratory artifact. Littmann L. J Electrocardiol. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):264-9. Epub 2009 Dec 2. PMID: 20399349
  25. Capsular contracture simulating myocardial infarction on ECG. Peters W, McEwan PPlast Reconstr Surg. 1993 Mar;91(3):529-32. PMID: 8438025
  26. Influence of electrode misplacement on the electrocardiographic signs of inferior myocardial ischemia. Rudiger A, Schöb L, Follath F. Am J Emerg Med. 2003 Nov;21(7):574-7.
  27. [False diagnosis of myocardial infarction due to inversion of the electrocardiographic leads in the right limbs (author’s transl)]. [Article in Spanish] Guijarro Morales A, Martos Ferrés F, Pagola Vilardebó C, Martín Jiménez V, Martí García JL, Peláez Redondo J. Med Clin (Barc). 1980 May 25;74(10):395-8.
  28. Delayed defibrillation caused by unexpected ECG artifact.[Bad lead selection and artifact] Stewart JA. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Nov;52(5):515-8. Epub 2008 Apr 3. PMID: 18387704
  29. An unusual ECG artifact–results of a faulty recorder. Agarwal SK. JAMA. 1979 Aug 17;242(7):617-8. PMID: 448997
  30. Electrocardiographic ST-segment depression: confirm, deny, or artifact? [Filters] Wong DH. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):352; author reply 352. PMID: 18648245 Free full text
  31. False ST elevation in a modified 12-lead surface electrocardiogram. Toosi MS, Sochanski MT. J Electrocardiol. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):197-201. Epub 2008 Mar 14. PMID: 18342880
  32. Myocardial infarction or technical artifact? [Electrode misplacement] MacKenzie R. J Insur Med. 2006;38(4):289-92. PMID: 17323759
  33. Simulation of anteroseptal myocardial infarction by electrocardiographic filters. Burri H, Sunthorn H, Shah D. J Electrocardiol. 2006 Jul;39(3):253-8. Epub 2006 Feb 28. PMID: 16777511
  34. Electrocardiographic artifact mimicking acute myocardial infarction. Siddiqui MA, Munugoti S, Khan IA. Int J Cardiol. 2003 Jan;87(1):99-101. PMID: 12468060
  35. Artifactual electrocardiographic change mimicking clinical abnormality on the ECG. Chase C, Brady WJ. Am J Emerg Med. 2000 May;18(3):312-6. PMID: 10830688
  36. An unusual electrocardiogram artifact in a patient with near syncope. Aslanger E. J Electrocardiol. 2010 Nov-Dec;43(6):686-8. Epub 2010 Jun 2. PMID: 20553822
  37. [Brugada or not-Brugada: misdiagnosis of recorder-induced artifact]. [Article in German] Z Kardiol. 2002 Dec;91(12):1061-3. Martius P, Krämer H.
  38. ECG artifacts and heart period variability: don’t miss a beat! Berntson GG, Stowell JR. Psychophysiology. 1998 Jan;35(1):127-32. PMID: 9499713
  39. Pacemaker malfunction: fact or artifact? Murdock DK, Moran JF, Stafford M, King L, Loeb HS, Scanlon PJ. Heart Lung. 1986 Mar;15(2):150-4.  PMID: 3633245
  40. An example of apparently normal electrocardiogram originating from incorrect electrocardiographic acquisition in a patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2010 May-Jun;43(3):222-3. Epub 2010 Mar 23. Aslanger E, Yalin K, Golcuk E, Oncul A.
  41. Double counting of heart rate by interpretation software: a new electrocardiographic sign of severe hyperkalemia. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;25(5):584-6. Littmann L, Brearley WD Jr, Taylor L 3rd, Monroe MH. PMID: 17543665
  42. Classic EKG changes of hypothermia. Mareedu RK, Grandhe NP, Gangineni S, Quinn DL. Clin Med Res. 2008 Dec;6(3-4):107-8. PMID: 19325173
  43. Common electrocardiographic artifacts mimicking arrhythmias in ambulatory monitoring. Márquez MF, Colín L, Guevara M, Iturralde P, Hermosillo AG. Am Heart J. 2002 Aug;144(2):187-97. PMID: 12177632
  44. Hiccup as an electrocardiographic artifact simulating arrhythmias. Am Heart J. 2003 Oct;146(4):E15; author reply E16. Cheng TO. PMID: 14564338
  45. “The Bait and Switch”. [Limb lead reversal due to inverted lead coupling conceals STEMI] Tom Bouthillet. EMS 12-Lead. 01-22-2011. Retrieved from:
  46. “Unusual EKG/ECG Pattern: You don’t see this everyday”. The Happy Hospitalist. 04-15-2011. Retrieved from: